Entries by Mike Mines

R. v. J.S. – Richmond Provincial Court

Charge: Mischief Under $5000.

Issue: Given the information provided to Crown counsel regarding our client’s personal circumstances and the circumstances of the offence, whether it was in the public interest to proceed with a criminal prosecution.

Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown counsel to allow our client into the Alternative Measures Program without approving a criminal charge. No criminal record.

B.H. – Professional Misconduct Investigation

Charge: Obligation to disclose information to BC Financial Services Authority.

Issue: Whether our client failed to comply with his obligations under Chartered Professional Accountants and Real Estate Services rules and regulations.

Result: Mr. Gauthier was able to provide information about our client and the circumstances of the incident to the BC Financial Services Authority which led to their decision to close the file without any finding of wrongdoing or ethical breach. No further action.

R. v. B.S. – Richmond Provincial Court

Charges: Unlawful Storage of a Firearm.

Issue: Whether it was in the public interest to proceed with a criminal prosecution.

Result: Mr. Mines persuaded Crown counsel to enter a stay of proceedings on the criminal charge upon our client agreeing to a forfeiture order and 5 year prohibition. No criminal record.

R. v. A.K. & N.L. – Insurance Fraud Investigation

Charge: Fraud Over $5000 investigation.

Issue: Given our client’s cooperation and repayment of the disputed funds, whether it was in the public interest to proceed with a police investigation and a criminal prosecution.

Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade the insurance company to settle the matter on a civil basis. No criminal charges recommended. No criminal record.

R. v. H.L. – Insurance Fraud Investigation

Charge: Fraud Over $5000 investigation.

Issue: Given our client’s cooperation and repayment of the disputed funds, whether it was in the public interest to proceed with a police investigation and a criminal prosecution.

Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade the insurance company to settle the matter on a civil basis. No criminal charges recommended. No criminal record.

R. v. S.N. – Quesnel Provincial Court

Charges: Assault (by choking); assault; mischief to property.

Issue: Whether there was a public interest in proceeding with the prosecution and whether there was a substantial likelihood of a conviction.

Result: Mr. Mines was able to provide information to Crown counsel which led to Crown deciding to enter a stay of proceedings. No criminal record.

R. v. L.C. – Insurance Fraud Investigation

Charge: Fraud Over $5000 investigation.

Issue: Given our client’s cooperation and repayment of the disputed funds, whether it was in the public interest to proceed with a police investigation and a criminal prosecution.

Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade the insurance company to settle the matter on a civil basis. No criminal charges recommended. No criminal record.