Our Successes
The vast majority of our clients’ cases are resolved favourably.
R. vs. P.S.A. – Vancouver Provincial Court
/in All Successes, Assault & Threatening Charges /by Mike MinesCharge: Assault.
Issue: Whether there was a substantial likelihood of a conviction.
Result: Mr. Johnson was able to direct Crown counsel to gaps in the police investigation resulting in Crown deciding to not approve any charge in this matter. No criminal record.
R. vs. S.J. – Port Coquitlam Provincial Court
/in All Successes, Driving Cases /by Mike MinesCharge: Driving While Prohibited.
Issue: Whether the crown would be able to prove that our client was the driver of the vehicle.
Result: We were able to persuade Crown counsel that there was problem with the identification evidence and, therefore, to proceed on the lesser offence of driving without a valid driver’s licence. Rather than a one year minimum driving prohibition, our client was sentenced to a $500 fine. No driving prohibition.
R. vs. M.L. – Vancouver Provincial Court
/in All Successes, Assault & Threatening Charges /by Mike MinesCharge: Assault; Uttering Threats (domestic).
Issue: Given the rehabilitative steps our client achieved under our direction, whether there was a public interest in proceeding with the criminal prosecution.
Result: Mr. Johnson was able to persuade Crown counsel to stay the charges. All restrictive conditions removed. No criminal record.
R. vs. C.S. – Port Coquitlam Provincial Court
/in All Successes, Assault & Threatening Charges /by Mike MinesCharge: Assault (domestic).
Issue: Whether there was a substantial likelihood of a conviction.
Result: Mr. Mines was able to point to a lack of evidence with respect to the charge resulting in Crown counsel entering a stay of proceedings. No criminal record.
R. vs. N.D. – Richmond Provincial Court
/in All Successes, Sexual Offence Cases /by Mike MinesCharge: Sexual Assault.
Issue: Whether there was a substantial likelihood of a conviction.
Result: Mr. Johnson was able to direct Crown counsel to various flaws in the prosecution’s case. On the eve of a 4 day trial, Crown agreed to resolve this matter by withdrawing the charge. Our client entered into a Peace Bond. No criminal record.
R. vs. B.M. – Vancouver Provincial Court
/in All Successes, Driving Cases /by Mike MinesCharge: Driving While Prohibited.
Issue: Whether it was appropriate for Crown counsel to proceed on this charge, which carries a mandatory minimum 12 month driving prohibition.
Result: Mr. Johnson was able to persuade Crown to proceed on the lesser offence of driving without a valid driver’s licence. After hearing Mr. johnson’s submissions, the court imposed a $500 fine. No driving prohibition.
R. vs. B.C. – Vancouver Provincial Court
/in All Successes, Assault & Threatening Charges /by Mike MinesCharge: Assault Causing Bodily Harm.
Issue: Given the rehabilitative steps our client had taken, whether it was in the public interest to proceed with the criminal charge.
Result: Mr. Johnson was able to persuade Crown counsel to stay the criminal charge. Our client entered into a Peace Bond for a period of 9 months. No criminal record.
R. vs. Z.H. – Port Coquitlam Youth Court
/in All Successes, Assault & Threatening Charges /by Mike MinesCharge: Assault Causing Bodily Harm.
Issue: Whether, given the history between our client and the complainant, it was reasonable for our client apply the level of force he used.
Result: Mr. Johnson was able to persuade Crown to not approve any criminal charge but, rather, to resolve the matter through Restorative Justice. No criminal record.
Y.Y. vs. Superintendent of Motor Vehicles – Review of Driving Prohibition
/in All Successes, Driving Cases /by Mike MinesCharge: Notice of Intent to Prohibit.
Issue: Whether RoadSafety BC had appropriate reasons to prohibit our client from driving for 4 months.
Result: Mr. Johnson was able to persuade the Superintendent’s adjudicator that the 4 month driving prohibition was not warranted. The driving prohibition was reduced to 2 months.
R. vs. R.H. – North Vancouver Provincial Court
/in All Successes, Assault & Threatening Charges /by Mike MinesCharges: Assault (x2); Threatening; Breach of Undertaking (domestic).
Issue: Given the rehabilitative steps our client had taken, whether it was appropriate for the Court to convict him.
Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown to proceed on only a single count of assault. After hearing Mr. Mines’ submissions, the Court granted our client a conditional discharge. No criminal conviction.
R. vs. D.I. – Vancouver Provincial Court
/in All Successes, Driving Cases /by Mike MinesCharges: Dangerous Driving Causing Bodily Harm; Driving Without Due Care and Attention.
Issue: Whether it was appropriate for Crown to charge our client under the Criminal Code or the Motor Vehicle Act in regard to an accident where our client’s vehicle struck a cyclist from behind, causing serious injury.
Result: Mr. Mines was able to provide information to Crown which resulted in Crown proceeding under the Motor Vehicle Act. After hearing Mr. Mines’ submissions, the Court sentenced our client to a $1000 fine and limited his ability to drive for 12 months. No criminal conviction. No loss of insurance coverage. No jail.
R. vs. C.G. – North Vancouver Provincial Court
/in All Successes, Assault & Threatening Charges /by Mike MinesCharge: s. 810 Peace Bond Application.
Issue: Given the rehabilitative steps our client had taken, whether the complainant continued to have fear of our client.
Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown counsel to withdraw its Peace Bond application. No conditions. No record.
