Our Successes
The vast majority of our clients’ cases are resolved favourably.
R. vs. J.B. – North Vancouver Provincial Court
/in All Successes, Drug Cases, Sexual Offence Cases/by adminCharge: Possession of Cocaine.
Issue: Whether the Crown could prove that our client had control over the drugs that were located near him.
Result: Upon considering our representations, Crown counsel concluded that there was insufficient evidence against our client and declined to approve a charge. No criminal record.
R. vs. M.S. – North Vancouver Provincial Court
/in All Successes, Driving Cases/by adminCharge: Dangerous Driving; Failing to Stop for Police; Possession of Controlled Substance.
Issue: Whether our client would be sentenced to jail.
Result: After hearing Mr. Mines’ submissions on our client’s behalf, the trial judge imposed a $1000 fine and a 12 month driving prohibition on the dangerous driving charge and the Crown stayed the remaining two charges. No jail.
R. vs. J.P. – Surrey Provincial Court
/in All Successes, Assault & Threatening Charges/by adminCharge: Assault (domestic).
Issue: Whether, given the rehabilitative steps our client had taken on his own initiative, there was a public interest in proceeding with the criminal charge.
Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown Counsel to stay the criminal charge upon our client entering into a “Peace Bond”. No criminal record.
R. vs. A.S. – Vancouver Criminal Court
/in All Successes, Assault & Threatening Charges/by adminCharge: Breach of Conditional Sentence Order (from Aggravated Assault conviction).
Issue: Whether there was a public interest in proceeding with the Breach allegation, given the rehabilitative steps our client had taken on his own initiative.
Result: Rather than facing termination of our client’s sentence of house arrest and the prospect of incarcaration for the balance of his sentence, Mr. Johmson was able to persuade Crown Counsel to withdraw the allegation of Breach. No jail.
R. vs. A.D. – Vancouver Provincial Court
/in All Successes, Assault & Threatening Charges/by adminCharge: Uttering a Threat.
Issue: Given the rehabilitative steps our client had taken on his own initiative, whether it was in the public interest to proceed with the prosecution.
Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown counsel to enter a stay of proceddings. No criminal record.
R. vs. X.L. – New Westminster Provincial Court
/in All Successes, Driving Cases/by adminCharge: Driving While Prohibited.
Issue: Whether it was in the public interest to proceed with the charge.
Result: Mr Johnson was able to persuade Crown Counsel to proceed on the lesser charge of driving without a licence. Rather than the 12 month minimum driving prohibition our client was facing, the Court imposed a 3 month prohibition.
R. vs. A.S. – Port Coquitlam Provincial Court
/in All Successes, Driving Cases/by adminCharge: Failing to obey a traffic control device.
Issue: Whether the police officer could accurately recall the physical characteristics of the roadway and the actions of our client.
Result: Upon conclusion of Mr. Mines’ cross examination of the officer, the Court dismissed the charge.
R. vs. S.B. – Vancouver Provincial Court
/in All Successes, Assault & Threatening Charges/by adminCharge: Aggravated Assault.
Issue: Whether our client acted in self defence in causing life threatening injuries to the complainant.
Result: After a two day trial, the court agreed with Mr. Johnson’s submissions that our client was acting in self defence. Not guilty. No criminal record.
R. vs. R.C. – Vancouver Police Investigation
/in All Successes, Theft & Fraud/by adminCharge: Theft; Fraud Over $5000.
Issue: Whether police would proceed with criminal charges.
Result: Mr. Mines was able to negotiate a civil settlement in the amount of $7,500 in this case where our client was alleged to have defrauded a corporation of more than $25,000. No criminal charges.
R. vs. S.T. – Abbotsford Provincial Court
/in All Successes, Driving Cases/by adminCharge: Speeding.
Issue: Whether our client’s right to be tried within a reasonable time had been breached.
Result: Crown Counsel agreed with our submission that the delay in bringing this matter to trial was in breach of our client’s Charter rights. Stay of Proceedings.
R. vs. T.D. – Richmond Provincial Court
/in All Successes, Sexual Offence Cases/by adminCharge: Possession of Child Pornography.
Issue: Whether the Crown could prove that our client had knowledge of the images that were sent by email to his computer.
Result: After reviewing the evidence and considering Mr. Mines’ representations, Crown Counsel declined to approve any charge in this matter. No criminal record.
R. vs. G.F. – North Vancouver Provincial Court
/in All Successes, Driving Cases/by adminCharge: Driving While Prohibited.
Issue: Whether the Crown could prove that our client had notice that he was prohibited.
Result: We were able to persuade Crown Counsel to proceed on the lesser charge of Failing to Produce a Licence. The court imposed a $1500 fine but after conidering Mr. Johnson’s submissions, did not order any driving prohibition.
